I don’t know, I’m starting to think it’s not too bad as long as they use the word “greatest” instead of “best”. Batistuta was a phenomenal striker but he won virtually nothing in his career so his “legacy” is certainly smaller than someone like Labruna who won a ton of trophies on top of all his scoring records. I mean, I also consider Pelé the “greatest” player ever, and Alex Ferguson the “greatest” manager ever, but I don’t consider either of them the “best” ever.
Plus the guy that made this list is trying to look at every era as absolutely equal, so being the best player of the 1910s is the same as being the best player of the 1990s. I guess it’s an impossible task to get the balance right since he obviously hasn’t watched every player listed here but I don’t think he did a terrible job considering there’s 1100 players on these lists. I mean, I don’t think I could do better
