| Pes Miti del Calcio http://www.pesmitidelcalcio.com/ |
|
| Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 http://www.pesmitidelcalcio.com/viewtopic.php?f=132&t=16163 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | ttt1009 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 7:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Name: James Hunter 'Jimmy' Leadbetter Nickname: "Sticks" Country: ScotlandClub: Ipswich Town Shirt Number: 11 Position: ★SMF, CMF, WF, SS (Optional) Side: LF/BS (Mainly Left) Age: 32-35 years (15/07/1928) Height: 174 cm Weight: 54 kg Attack: 78 Defence: 60 Balance: 72 Stamina: 80 Top Speed: 74 Acceleration: 77 Response: 73 Agility: 75 Dribble Accuracy: 78 Dribble Speed: 75 Short Pass Accuracy: 85 Short Pass Speed: 80 Long Pass Accuracy: 94 Long Pass Speed: 82 Shot Accuracy: 75 Shot Power: 82 Shot Technique: 74 Free Kick Accuracy: 71 Curling: 80 Header: 68 Jump: 70 Technique: 85 Aggression: 78 Mentality: 82 Goalkeeper Skills: 50 Team Work: 84 Injury Tolerance: B Condition: 6 Weak Foot Accuracy: 4 Weak Foot Frequency: 4 Consistency: 6 Growth type: Late Peak CARDS: P06 – Pinpoint Pass P07 – Early Cross S02 – Passer S05 – 1-Touch Play S06 – Outside Curve SPECIAL ABILITIES: Playmaking - Passing - 1-Touch Pass - Outside - Penalties Attack/Defence Awareness Card: Balanced Jimmy Leadbetter was a Scottish outside-left who became a cornerstone of Alf Ramsey’s Ipswich Town from 1955 to 1965, helping the club climb from Third Division South winners to Second Division champions and, remarkably, First Division title-winners at the first attempt in 1961–62. Before Ipswich he was used primarily as an inside-forward (notably at Brighton), a grounding that sharpened his close control and eye for the threaded pass; at Portman Road he shifted wider on the left and evolved into the side’s creative hub. On the pitch he paired guile with quiet steel. Though lightweight in frame, he consistently held possession under close control - hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles. From the left he drifted into midfield pockets to dictate rhythm, then released early slide rule throughball or measured crosses with pinpoint accuracy, racking up assists for Ted Phillips and Ray Crawford. Calm from the spot, composed in tight spaces, and relentlessly team-oriented, he functioned as the left-sided creator rather than a touchline sprinter. Spoiler: show |
|
| Author: | Artemds_2 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
"he was reasonably strong and resilient—hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles." and just got 72 in body balance? |
|
| Author: | Interista93 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Artemds_2 wrote: "he was reasonably strong and resilient—hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles." and just got 72 in body balance? I can't even imagine a player who was 174 x 54 having green BAL. At most, I would increase TEC to make the guy more capable of keeping the ball to his feet. |
|
| Author: | ttt1009 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Interista93 wrote: Artemds_2 wrote: "he was reasonably strong and resilient—hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles." and just got 72 in body balance? I can't even imagine a player who was 174 x 54 having green BAL. At most, I would increase TEC to make the guy more capable of keeping the ball to his feet. you are right, i just didnt think 54kg can earn him green value in BAL. Although his teammate said that he was strong in training. TEC increased. |
|
| Author: | Artemds_2 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Interista93 wrote: Artemds_2 wrote: "he was reasonably strong and resilient—hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles." and just got 72 in body balance? I can't even imagine a player who was 174 x 54 having green BAL. At most, I would increase TEC to make the guy more capable of keeping the ball to his feet. That has nothing to do (at least not always), Tevez (Gatusso too) was really strong against taller players, and modern players are bigger than from past generations |
|
| Author: | Interista93 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Artemds_2 wrote: That has nothing to do (at least not always), Tevez (Gatusso too) was really strong against taller players, and modern players are bigger than from past generations Tévez was 170 x 73 and Gattuso was 177 x 77. Both were definitely quite bulky and muscular. And even so, I don't agree much on the BAL 87 and 88 that Tévez has in his sets here. |
|
| Author: | Artemds_2 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Interista93 wrote: Artemds_2 wrote: That has nothing to do (at least not always), Tevez (Gatusso too) was really strong against taller players, and modern players are bigger than from past generations Tévez was 170 x 73 and Gattuso was 177 x 77. Both were definitely quite bulky and muscular. And even so, I don't agree much on the BAL 87 and 88 that Tévez has in his sets here. but neither low greens would be right for Tevez. that is the issue, at least low yellows to remark they were strong enough |
|
| Author: | Interista93 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Artemds_2 wrote: but neither low greens would be right for Tevez. that is the issue, at least low yellows to remark they were strong enough Yes, absolutely. The 83 that Tévez has in the third set is perfect, in my opinion. But 72 for Leadbetter is more than enough. |
|
| Author: | Artemds_2 [ Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Well I surelly disagree rating players by his weight/height, but I appreciate the effort of making Ipswich players. |
|
| Author: | ttt1009 [ Tue Nov 11, 2025 4:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jimmy LEADBETTER 1960-1963 |
Artemds_2 wrote: "he was reasonably strong and resilient—hard to knock off the ball, diligent, and unafraid to put in tackles." and just got 72 in body balance? Updated his resume to avoid any confusion. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|