It is currently Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:29 am

Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
 John BARNES 1987-1991 
Author Message

Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:31 pm
Posts: 465
Name: John Charles Bryan Barnes

Nickname: "Digger"


Country: :ENG: England
Club: Liverpool F.C.
Position: *WF, SS, SMF, AMF
Side: LF/LS
Age: 23-27 years (07/11/1963)

Height: 180 cm
Weight: 79 kg

Attack: 83
Defence: 40
Balance: 86
Stamina: 84
Top Speed: 82
Acceleration: 82
Response: 80
Agility: 81
Dribble Accuracy: 92
Dribble Speed: 87
Short Pass Accuracy: 83
Short Pass Speed: 80
Long Pass Accuracy: 85
Long Pass Speed: 83
Shot Accuracy: 82
Shot Power: 85
Shot Technique: 85
Free kick accuracy: 84
Curling: 87
Header: 79
Jump: 82
Technique: 89
Aggression: 85
Mentality: 77
Goalkeeping Skills: 50
Team Work: 83

Injury Tolerance: B
Condition: 7
Weak Foot Accuracy: 6
Weak Foot Frequency: 5
Consistency: 6
Growth type: Standard

S01 - Marauding
S02 - Passer
S06 - Outside curve
S14 - Speed Merchant
P09 - Cut Back Pass
P10 - Incisive Run

SPECIAL ABILITIES: Dribbling - Reaction - Passing - Outside

Attack/Defence Awareness Card: Attack Minded


“The Digger” John Barnes is one of the greatest English left-wingers of all-time. He was famous for his powerful running, acceleration and ability to score on his own. He began his career with Watford and his outstanding performance led him to be signed for Liverpool after their golden era had passed. Barnes remained going on his impressive playing and established himself in all-time Liverpool XI for many sources. Internationally, He was not used at the 1986 World Cup until the quarter final against Argentina when England were trailing 2-0 with 15 minutes, setting up one goal for Gary Lineker and laying on another chance which Lineker missed. Barnes had been recognized for his contribution in the game.

Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:34 am

Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm
Posts: 1699
I have watched him several times from 1986-1988 games and I doubt he was that fast. He looked like a heavy player (fit but heavy), his TS was something like 78-80 and ACC wasn't better than that either, seemed less agile too.

Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:25 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.