It is currently Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:16 pm

Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
 António LIMA PEREIRA 1983-1987 
Author Message

Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 8:47 am
Posts: 545
Location: Serbia
Name: António José Lima Pereira

Nickname: "-"


Country: :POR: Portugal
Club: FC Porto
Number: 4 | 10 (EURO 1984)
Position: *CB
Side: RF/BS
Age: 31-35 years (01/02/1952)

Height: 187 cm
Weight: 81 kg

Attack: 59
Defence: 87
Balance: 87
Stamina: 80
Top Speed: 73
Acceleration: 75
Response: 80
Agility: 68
Dribble Accuracy: 72
Dribble Speed: 69
Short Pass Accuracy: 72
Short Pass Speed: 71
Long Pass Accuracy: 70
Long Pass Speed: 73
Shot Accuracy: 59
Shot Power: 80
Shot Technique: 60
Free Kick Accuracy: 58
Curling: 63
Header: 84
Jump: 81
Technique: 73
Aggression: 61
Mentality: 86
Goalkeeper Skills: 50
Team Work: 80

Injury Tolerance: B
Condition: 6
Weak Foot Accuracy: 5
Weak Foot Frequency: 5
Consistency: 7
Growth Type: Late/Lasting



Attack / Defence Awareness Card: Defense Minded


António Lima Pereira is a center back who played for Porto for eleven years. He was a part of the team that participated in the club's first European final losing against Juventus in the CWC final. He also was a member of a European Cup winning squad, although he didn't appear in the final match. He was very reliable defender, with good reading of the game, he was strong in physical contact. He wasn't prone to complicate in the defense, always finding easy but good solutions. He played good with his head, although he didn't have some big leap. Also, he was slow and he often reacted late when in situation to intercept some passes and when the opposing player is in dribbling. He mostly relied on his positioning in his defensive duties. He played in 20 games for the Portuguese NT, representing it on the Euro 1984.

Last edited by Milos on Sat Feb 23, 2019 12:33 am, edited 2 times in total.

Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:45 pm
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 2659
Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
I'd reduce even further his RES and JUM, but that's only because of the info given here, so it shouldn't be taken in count as long you are confident with the current values :^]

Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:01 pm

Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 8:47 am
Posts: 545
Location: Serbia
I get your point, but I think that these values are just fine. Maybe JUM can be reduced by one point (not necessarily), but IMO, both values should remain in low yellows.

Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:24 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.