|
It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 10:21 pm |
|
All times are UTC |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 8 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Miguel MUÑOZ 1955-1957
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135 
|
Name: Miguel Muñoz
Nickname: "-"  Country:  SpainClub: Real Madrid CF Position: *DMF Side: RF/BS Age: 33-35 years (19/01/1922) Height: 178 cm Aprox. Weight: 76 kg Aprox. Attack: 75 Defence: 72 Balance: 84 Stamina: 81 Top Speed: 72 Acceleration: 75 Response: 76 Agility: 70 Dribble Accuracy: 81 Dribble Speed: 74 Short Pass Accuracy: 86 Short Pass Speed: 72 Long Pass Accuracy: 85 Long Pass Speed: 76 Shot Accuracy: 72 Shot Power: 84 Shot Technique: 70 Free Kick Accuracy: 70 Curling: 78 Header: 75 Jump: 72 Technique: 81 Aggression: 70 Mentality: 91 Keeper Skills: 50 Teamwork: 85 Injury Tolerance: B Condition: 4 Weak Foot Accuracy: 5 Weak Foot Frequency: 5 Consistency: 6 Growth type: Standard/Lasting CARDS: P18: Talisman S02: Passer SPECIAL ABILITIES: Playmaking - Passing - Centre Attack/Defence Awareness Card: Balanced Last edited by Cristiano_Naniano on Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:00 pm, edited 4 times in total. |
| Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:17 am |
 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:51 pm Posts: 589
|
General update
|
| Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:57 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:51 pm Posts: 589
|
|
| Tue Sep 30, 2014 2:03 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135
|
Quote: Las principales virtudes de Miguel Muñoz como futbolista eran la capacidad física, el trabajo, el sacrificio y la entrega. Sus carencias técnicas eran suplidas por el gran complemento que para él era Zárraga. Si Muñoz era el ‘comandante’ de las opciones ofensivas, Zarraga lo era de las defensivas |
| Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:51 pm Posts: 589
|
Updated
 I updated with your set for him (not all your set but part of it) |
| Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:00 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135
|
One thing I can tell for sure is that Munoz seemed better offensively than defensively (I don't know why people around the net gave him better DEF than ATT), on the footage I have seen he acted like a playmaker when the team had the ball, he made the link between the defence and the attack, didn't seem responsive or very good defensively. On the other hand his short passes were good, he had a good vision too. I didn't give him great physical stats (BB/STA) as he was already 34/35 on the footage I watched, and he didn't seem to run much, that was more Zarraga's task.
|
| Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:06 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:51 pm Posts: 589
|
The thing about better DEF than ATT could be because he was DMF and lot of people thinks in defensive than attack in that aspect (I usually think that because It's the "normal" thing, with some exception), but it has sense... I remember some of the matches I saw about him playing in the field as DMF but working as CMF
|
| Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135
|
Yes, probably, in my notes I rated him with ATT > DEF when I watched the footage although I couldn't make a definitive statement as it was just few minutes of videos and then I read the quote I posted above that comforted me in my opinion. I like your DEF value, the 74 I gave him is probably a bit much according to what he displayed defensive-wise.
|
| Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:35 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 8 posts ] |
|
All times are UTC |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |