|
It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 12:56 pm
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Jimmy JOHNSTONE 1966-1967
Author |
Message |
MagicDip
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135
|
Name: James "Jimmy" Connelly JohnstoneNicknames: "Jinky" , "The Wee Man" , "The Lord of the Wing" Country: ScotlandClub: Celtic GlasgowPosition: ★WF , SMFSide: RF/BS (Mainly R) Age: 21-23 years (30/09/1944 - † 13/03/2006) Height: 157 cmWeight: 52 kgAttack: 85Defence: 40Balance: 75Stamina: 83Top Speed: 82Acceleration: 92Response: 80Agility: 88Dribble Accuracy: 93Dribble Speed: 85Short Pass Accuracy: 80Short Pass Speed: 72Long Pass Accuracy: 83Long Pass Speed: 76Shot Accuracy: 81Shot Power: 80Shot Technique: 80Free Kick Accuracy: 68Curling: 78Header: 72Jump: 84Technique: 85Aggression: 93Mentality: 78Goalkeeper Skills: 50Team Work: 74Injury Tolerance: ACondition: 6Weak Foot Accuracy: 5Weak Foot Frequency: 5Consistency: 6Growth Type: Early/LastingCARDS:P03 - Trickster P09 - Cut Back Pass P10 - Incisive Run S15 - Shoulder Feint Skills SPECIAL ABILITIES: Dribbling - Passing - Side Attack/Defence Awareness: Attack-Minded
|
Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:01 am |
|
 |
MagicDip
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:26 pm Posts: 2135
|
Here too some things are over the top:
I have him at TS 82, for the same reason than Lennox. ACC is more or less it. AGI, I don't know why people around the net give him a so high value there, it's not correct, he was agile but not in that extreme way, I have him at 88 atm and I feel that it could be even a bit less. I found someone like Simoes for example comparatively more fluid in his moves than Johnstone. Same for DS, usually speaking these old players were hardly orange/red material there, I have him at 85. TECH is too much as well, he was probably among the most gifted of that Celtic team in that aspect but I don't see anyone in the team over 85 in that matter and I would precisely give him 85.
He has too much cards as well, I only gave him these ones:
P03 - Trickster P09 - Cut Back Pass P10 - Incisive Run (S15 - Shoulder Feint Skills)
overall, I find players here with too much (unnecessary) cards.
I forgot to mention it but his TW is probably a bit high too, he could work decently for the team but used to dribble and keep the ball while in possession, I'd rather go for a "high" white value like 73/74 there.
|
Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:14 pm |
|
 |
StuartBannigan
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:43 pm Posts: 1650
|
I completely disagree with downgrading him in his technical and physical aspects, he is undoubtedly one of the 3 best Scottish players of all time and that Celtic team didn't beat Herrera's Inter for no reason, in fact they should have beaten them by more. If anything AGI is underrated, he was one of the best dribblers of the 60s and was nicknamed Jinky for a reason, he was incredibly agile. I'd have him on high orange or even low red, I don't see him as inferior to Gento in that regard and he's on 94. I'd even say that it was his main weapon, and that should be reflected in the stats. TEC again should be going up instead of down, 88 or 89 would be more fair.
On the other hand MEN is far too high, his lack of professionalism and determination was always his main weakness and the reason he didn't achieve even more in his career. Mid greens would be fine, 77 would be my suggestion. And white TMW I also agree with, he was incredibly individualistic, famously so even. There's a very famous story in Glasgow of him beating a player, and instead of running forward and playing on, he turned around and beat him again just for fun.
|
Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:01 am |
|
 |
El Capo
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am Posts: 3407 Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
|
Jimmy was impressive for the era he played, however professional football was still at its beginning...Players like Robben or Ribéry at their physical and technical peak are (with all the respect J.J deserves) at least 5 leagues ahead of him.
|
Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:20 am |
|
 |
StuartBannigan
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:43 pm Posts: 1650
|
Of course, but I generally find agility to be one of the things that hasn't changed too much over the years, in fact old school goalkeepers even look more agile at times. Jinky was truly one of a kind in that regard. Robben is surely one of the greatest wingers of all time but for sheer skill, flair and trickery I'd take Johnstone over him.
|
Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:33 am |
|
 |
artemds
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:07 am Posts: 568
|
StuartBannigan wrote: If anything AGI is underrated, he was one of the best dribblers of the 60s and was nicknamed Jinky for a reason, he was incredibly agile. I'd have him on high orange or even low red, I don't see him as inferior to Gento in that regard and he's on 94. I'd even say that it was his main weapon, and that should be reflected in the stats. TEC again should be going up instead of down, 88 or 89 would be more fair.
. I agree with AGI, should be higher since he was a fly in the field.
|
Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:56 am |
|
 |
lizurka
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 7:40 pm Posts: 20
|
https://youtu.be/YEDMG8bB4dE2:21 check out that top speed, at least 90 imo
|
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:11 am |
|
 |
Interista93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 am Posts: 4574
|
lizurka wrote: https://youtu.be/YEDMG8bB4dE
2:21 check out that top speed, at least 90 imo That's clearly a sudden increase of speed, which means acceleration.
|
Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:59 am |
|
 |
StuartBannigan
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:43 pm Posts: 1650
|
He had short little legs, often he would beat a defender with skill or acceleration but then they would catch up to him and foul him. Honestly, in the times I’ve watched him I was a little disappointed, mostly because he just seemed to get fouled all the time, he rarely beat more than one defender. He also rarely tried any long runs, he was just out on his wing trying to beat the full back and that was his entire game. So I think TS is pretty accurate, he basically only operated in small spaces, not dissimilar to Garrincha.
|
Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 pm |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|